McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:6TH WV2 – THE INCREDIBLE HULK BY TODD MCFARLANE (THE INCREDIBLE HULK #345)
McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:6TH WV2 – WOLVERINE BY TODD MCFARLANE (THE INCREDIBLE HULK #340)
McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:10TH WV2 – VENOM (THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #316)
McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:10TH WV2 – CAPTAIN AMERICA (CAPTAIN AMERICA #100)
McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:10TH WV2 – MILES MORALES (MILES MORALES: SPIDER-MAN #1)
McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:10TH WV2 – MAGNETO (X-MEN #1)
McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:10TH WV2 – SPIDER-MAN (THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #68)(GOLD LABEL)
McFarlane MARVEL COLLECTION 1:6TH – SPIDER-MAN (SYMBIOTE SUIT) BY TODD MCFARLANE (THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #300)
Ahhhh.....just the added ego boost old Toddsey needs. What could make this any better than getting to do my thing over another one of my things? Adding my signature to it. Lol. Todd is in total self satisfying heaven right now. I am very glad to see they're at least starting to call it for what it really is instead of calling it a POSED FIGURE. It's a statue. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Shown below is the new McFarlane Toys Todd McFarlane Autograph GameStop Exclusive Marvel The Amazing Spider-Man (Issue 323) Captain America 1:6th Scale Statue is available for pre-order from Gamestop with a suggested retail price of $79.99.Guest-starring Captain America! As tensions boil over in Symkaria, Cap provides an assist to Spider-man and Silver Sable. Will the trio be able to pull a heist of ULTIMATUM's HQ? More truths revealed about the mysterious Solo.FeaturesIncluded art card SIGNED by Todd McFarlaneInspired by: The Amazing Spider-Man Issue #3231:6th Scale collectible with environmental base and backdrop sceneIncludes The Amazing Spider-Man #323 comic bookCollect all McFarlane Toys Marvel Collectibles
On 8/6/2024 at 11:49 PM, frozentenderloin said:I honestly think he makes stuff like this because statues are what HE likes, and not necessarily looking to meet the needs of a specific demographic. Despite the fact that articulation is a huge component in what the majority of action figure collectors today desire from their toy lines, McFarlane consistently tries to lean back into statues as much as possible. Its his toy company, so he can do what he wants, but I often wish he wasnt so resistant to articulation like he seems to be. Ive read that he thinks articulation is ugly. If thats the case, why not try and come up with sone new type of articulation that is less visible? Hasbro and other companies are continuing to attempt to modernize articulation to make it less visible when possible. Pinless joints are a good example of something they have started implementing the past couple of years which has helped a bit. That said, I have always felt that it is okay for a toy to look like a toy. Id rather have a highly posable figure that can be displayed however I want it to over a statue that I cannot manipulate whatsoever. Thats just me though.
Not only does he think articulation is ugly he hates it. He loathes it. He's said such on many many occasions. He thinks TOYS should be works of art and it's okay to abandon poseability over aesthetics. Are you kidding me? They are called toys for a reason. In their description alone they are made to be played with. And he makes no distinction between actual toys and what he does. He thinks of them as one and the same. This from the guy who revolutionized the toy industry in the 90's and actually made Toybiz want to do something better which lead to the modern articulation era. His contribution to the action figure world is not to be discounted but he only does any articulation at all only to be able to land licenses like Fortnite and Warhammer and DC. These companies wanted figures with full articulation and he only caved in order to get these licenses. The multiple sports licenses he had carried him for a while but before he landed the Fortinite license he was on the brink of collapse. If you look at what he does with his figures even now the articulation is only an afterthought. They basically start with an articulated structure and then they cover it with details and overlay and deco with no consideration if the articulation works or not in the end. And often outright eliminates some aspects of his already limited articulation standard if it interferes with the look of the figure too much. Anyone who's ever tried to pose a DCM figure knows what I'm talking about. And don't even expect any sort of scale. His disregard for scale is second only to Diamond Select. Sure the big figures are bigger and the average figures are average but even among other figures of similar size nothing scales out. His products are action figures in the worst sense. Only to get them in the toy isles. He's got an purely artist's heart. Which isn't always a bad thing but in the case of toys it is. This thing he's doing with Marvel is his dream job. This is what he's wanted all along. No movement, no scale, some seams, no reason to do anything with it but sit it on a shelf and look at it. This is his comfort zone and it wouldn't surprise me if he's just gone and left the action figure part of his business to one of his subordinates and is immersing his full effort into this. That certainly seems to be the case as quickly as he's churning these out. Whatever. Maybe the action figure side will get better. Personally I don't like statues. They look good but I don't have the time, space or money to burn for static artwork. But that's just me. From my experience there is a distinction between action figure people and statue people. But there is also quite a bit of overlap so I know these will appeal to many people as well. I just don't think this is going to be anywhere near as lucrative as his action figure line. I think this kind of thing will be able to survive because of the action figure line. Not in spite of it.
On 8/6/2024 at 7:35 PM, The Mad Bubbler said:I wish there were promo photos of these without the janky cardboard backgrounds. These look... okay, overall, I guess. They're the plastic equivalent of a shrug to me. The only one that really looks bad to me is Cap, with his pelvis jutting forward, but none of them look good enough for me to want at full price. Even in the promo shots, the paint jobs aren't impressive, and with McFarlane's track record, I'm sure they won't look any better in person. It's hard enough to keep up with all of the Marvel Legends releases as it is. I'm not quite sure what demographic these are marketed to- a lot of Marvel Legends collectors will pass on them, due to lack of articulation and incompatibility. A lot of statue collectors will pass on them because they're not executed well enough.
I honestly think he makes stuff like this because statues are what HE likes, and not necessarily looking to meet the needs of a specific demographic. Despite the fact that articulation is a huge component in what the majority of action figure collectors today desire from their toy lines, McFarlane consistently tries to lean back into statues as much as possible. Its his toy company, so he can do what he wants, but I often wish he wasnt so resistant to articulation like he seems to be. Ive read that he thinks articulation is ugly. If thats the case, why not try and come up with sone new type of articulation that is less visible? Hasbro and other companies are continuing to attempt to modernize articulation to make it less visible when possible. Pinless joints are a good example of something they have started implementing the past couple of years which has helped a bit. That said, I have always felt that it is okay for a toy to look like a toy. Id rather have a highly posable figure that can be displayed however I want it to over a statue that I cannot manipulate whatsoever. Thats just me though.
I wish there were promo photos of these without the janky cardboard backgrounds. These look... okay, overall, I guess. They're the plastic equivalent of a shrug to me. The only one that really looks bad to me is Cap, with his pelvis jutting forward, but none of them look good enough for me to want at full price. Even in the promo shots, the paint jobs aren't impressive, and with McFarlane's track record, I'm sure they won't look any better in person. It's hard enough to keep up with all of the Marvel Legends releases as it is. I'm not quite sure what demographic these are marketed to- a lot of Marvel Legends collectors will pass on them, due to lack of articulation and incompatibility. A lot of statue collectors will pass on them because they're not executed well enough.
The McFarlane Toys Marvel Comics 1/6 & 1/10th Posed Figures featuring 1/6 Posed Figures of Spider-man & Captain America ($49.99 each) as well as 1/10th Posed Figures of Deadpool, Wolverine, Iron Man and Spider-man ($29.99 each) which are Inspired by famous covers are in-stock at our sponsor BigBadToyStore.com.
Deadpool looks awesome. I wish that was a ML
Was excited at first for the Wolverine to possibly build out the X-Men #1 cover but I think I'm going to pass.
The McFarlane Toys Marvel Comics 1/6 & 1/10th Posed Figures featuring 1/6 Posed Figures of Spider-man & Captain America - $49.99 each as well as 1/10th Posed Figures of Deadpool, Wolverine, Iron Man and Spider-man - $29.99 each which are Inspired by famous covers are available for pre-order at places like our sponsors BigBadToyStore.com and Entertainment Earth as well as Amazon!
I'm not terribly interested in these. I've made the mistake of buying things like this before from McFarlane. I've got a handful of the DC Multiverse posed figures/statues and I made the mistake of buying his Jumanji stuff when it was 90% off. Even at 90% off, it wasn't worth it. I figure that eventually and inevitably that he'll have to run a huge clearance sale on these too and maybe I'll bite then, but I certainly won't miss them if I don't.
Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!
Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy
©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE