❮
❯
Comments...
This is how you stay toy collectors young. Faust - 2021-03-24 @ 6:34 pm
I'd be happy with these as a kid. Pretty sweet line imo for what they are.
3 minutes ago, leokearon said:Not all of the a number of the Mini-Pretenders didn't need to change fold in their limbs True. Those were all much smaller than their shells though, and were basically little rectangular blocks that fit in to much bigger shells, with the bigger parts of the vehicle or beast mode hooked on to the outer shell, as opposed to the thin, more action-figure-ish 'bots of the first year/full-sized pretenders, so I figured those were the best comparison. They could definitely figure out something better to do with the Mech Strike figure arms, though- the lack of any controls for the mech is odd, without their arms being in the mech's arms.
5 minutes ago, The Mad Bubbler said:To be fair, that was because the inner 'bots of the Pretender Transformers all had arms that folded behind their backs (and feet that flipped down to be fully vertical), and I'm guessing Hasbro wouldn't want the figures to be folded in to weird poses that the human body can't be put in, but it would be nice if the figure arms could at least hold on to the undersides of the mech arms in some way, so it looked like they were controlling them. Not all of the a number of the Mini-Pretenders didn't need to change fold in their limbs mako - 2021-03-24 @ 5:01 pm
Not really something I'd buy, but I'm happy to see SOMEONE remembers who toys should be made for. I wish 'em all the success in the world.
8 minutes ago, leokearon said:They did back in the 80's apparently they have forgotten or couldn't be bothered To be fair, that was because the inner 'bots of the Pretender Transformers all had arms that folded behind their backs (and feet that flipped down to be fully vertical), and I'm guessing Hasbro wouldn't want the figures to be folded in to weird poses that the human body can't be put in, but it would be nice if the figure arms could at least hold on to the undersides of the mech arms in some way, so it looked like they were controlling them.
1 hour ago, Hogun said:Couldn't Hasbro have found a way to put the toys' arms inside the mech? Instead making them look like a weaker version of Four Arms from Ben 10. God, I really hope Hasbro does not make Legends versions of these. They did back in the 80's apparently they have forgotten or couldn't be bothered
55 minutes ago, monron999 said:Hmmm....does this mean that Hasbro has somehow been able to crack the code of being able to fit a regular sized action figure inside the shell of a large Mech figure?Y'know that thing that the ML team said was "impossible" back in the day when we were all hoping to get that for that Hulkbuster? Even if you need to remove the figures arms to make it happen, I think the Moira figure has shown us that that kind of radical design is not only possible, but it's available right now! The possibilities are endless. I mean, youcoulddo anything from the MCU Hulkbuster to.......well, to Comic Hulkbuster! Oh, the miracle of modern engineering. But seriously, where's it at already, Hasbro? Is it possible that one of the figures in this secret MCU line up for this year might have a Hulkbuster with removable figure (be it Stark or Bruce) in the plan?I would pay the $60 to have both options. Plus it's a sneaky way to use the scrawny suit buck for like the 90th time to give us two of the civilian figures we've been asking for. Printing money, baby! Just print the money. And yes I would willingly pay for a comic book hulkbuster, it has been far too long. And I would only buy a MCU one if it is the mark from Infinity war. I wouldn't pay for a rerelease of the age of ultron one.
37 minutes ago, Hogun said:Couldn't Hasbro have found a way to put the toys' arms inside the mech? Instead making them look like a weaker version of Four Arms from Ben 10. God, I really hope Hasbro does not make Legends versions of these. I mean this is really for children so specs like that they dont give a #$## I mean I wouldn't either. But I agree that hasbro shouldn't make something like this in ML. Hogun - 2021-03-24 @ 3:33 pm
Couldn't Hasbro have found a way to put the toys' arms inside the mech? Instead making them look like a weaker version of Four Arms from Ben 10. God, I really hope Hasbro does not make Legends versions of these.
MARVEL ACTION FIGURE RETAIL SPONSORS
Shop Online Stores for Hasbro Marvel Legends
Shopping links on this site may generate revenue when a purchase is made.
More
SOCIAL NETWORKS
ToyNewsI
MarvelousNews
Tformers
JediInsider
Entertainment News International (ENI) is the oldest, largest, and most popular news source for adult toy collectors (kidults) all around the world.
Get the scoop every day on all the popular culture action figures, comics, games, movies, toys, and more!
Contact and Support
Advertising |
Submit News |
Contact ENI |
Privacy Policy
All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Please Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE
|