Hasbro Marvel Legends Series Target Exclusive Jean Grey (X-Factor) Figure In-Stock Now

My Jean is on the way!

Thanks for the heads up Jay, was able to finally snag one.

Good looking out JC I reluctantly bought her

Not sure why this Electro figure was priced the way it was in the first place. I'm sure it's a cool enough figure, but $10 above retail? Not surprise to see it marked down.

On 5/24/2025 at 5:11 AM, McHogan said:

The only conclusion that can be drawn from the price drop on Electro is that us fans decided he wasn't a $35-40 figure and the only way they can recoup some of their loss is to discount him.

Let's face it: no Foxx likeness, not an extraordinary amount of accessories.... no way they should have priced this figure how they did.

I got mine as a birthday gift along with Symbiote Spider-Man 3 so I didn't eat that cost but to be honest, Electro was the least interesting returning villain from NWH, so I wasn't paying the retail price anyway. But $21 ...? Now you are speaking my language

Exactly, like where is the Deluxe money going anyways, the Electric effects which have been put to the side of the packaging so he has to go into a bigger box.

The only conclusion that can be drawn from the price drop on Electro is that us fans decided he wasn't a $35-40 figure and the only way they can recoup some of their loss is to discount him.

Let's face it: no Foxx likeness, not an extraordinary amount of accessories.... no way they should have priced this figure how they did.

I got mine as a birthday gift along with Symbiote Spider-Man 3 so I didn't eat that cost but to be honest, Electro was the least interesting returning villain from NWH, so I wasn't paying the retail price anyway. But $21 ...? Now you are speaking my language

Wish Legends sold accessory packs. I don't want this figure, but I love the lightning effects.

On 5/7/2025 at 2:47 PM, AndyL said:

Off the subject but since Hasbro and Marvel are into the sharing phase why can't Hasbro share in the closely guarded secret on how to use reverse ball joints with ab crunch at the same time as they do with G.I. Joe? And of course I know all the usual suspects are ready to come out and tell me about how Hasbro owns GIJ versus leasing Marvel but it still doesn't track. The money for the license is spent. Might as well make good use of it to make the best product possible. Trying to cut as may corners as you can to try and save money to recover some of the capital spent procuring the license is ridiculous. Move on. Make the best product you can so people will have the incentive to buy it and it works. I'm more than certain the fact that G.I. Joe is so well made and have a decent yet not excessive amount of accessories is the reason it does so well. It is for me. I'm not the biggest Joe fan but they are just so darn good I get as many as I can. They are always sold out. Always. And while ML still sells well I've never seen them sold out. True that maybe it's just a regional thing but I do travel to many regions in the country and it still more or less holds true.

Because all the different Toy divisions work separately to avoid any potential leaks; which clearly doesn't work

On 5/7/2025 at 7:47 AM, AndyL said:

Off the subject but since Hasbro and Marvel are into the sharing phase why can't Hasbro share in the closely guarded secret on how to use reverse ball joints with ab crunch at the same time as they do with G.I. Joe? And of course I know all the usual suspects are ready to come out and tell me about how Hasbro owns GIJ versus leasing Marvel but it still doesn't track. The money for the license is spent. Might as well make good use of it to make the best product possible. Trying to cut as may corners as you can to try and save money to recover some of the capital spent procuring the license is ridiculous.

It could be something as simple as the licensing agreement stipulates that ML figure design is limited to certain technologies, or patterns. This could have been something written in the agreement some time ago and just never gotten changed or updated. This kind of thing does happen because the licensor often wants consistency in their product, and making a mechanical change to basic tooling costs money. It's probably why the Sunfire and Vulcan tooling saw so much use.Now, why would the Maximum line suddenly be allowed to use it??Maximum would be considered to be a sub-line ML, essentially another brand within the brand, and allowing it to use new technology from the word go. ML may not get that upgrade change.At least that is what i think.

On 5/6/2025 at 3:13 PM, TheArrow said:

ROM is actually owned by Hasbro- a REVESRE-license situation to Disney/Marvel. Stems from the acquisition of Parker bros to Hasbro many years ago. What Marvel actually own of ROM is pretty much all the backstory to the character.So I think Hasbro dumped some 'passion' into this one because it's one of their own--like GI Joe, in a sense.

Off the subject but since Hasbro and Marvel are into the sharing phase why can't Hasbro share in the closely guarded secret on how to use reverse ball joints with ab crunch at the same time as they do with G.I. Joe? And of course I know all the usual suspects are ready to come out and tell me about how Hasbro owns GIJ versus leasing Marvel but it still doesn't track. The money for the license is spent. Might as well make good use of it to make the best product possible. Trying to cut as may corners as you can to try and save money to recover some of the capital spent procuring the license is ridiculous. Move on. Make the best product you can so people will have the incentive to buy it and it works. I'm more than certain the fact that G.I. Joe is so well made and have a decent yet not excessive amount of accessories is the reason it does so well. It is for me. I'm not the biggest Joe fan but they are just so darn good I get as many as I can. They are always sold out. Always. And while ML still sells well I've never seen them sold out. True that maybe it's just a regional thing but I do travel to many regions in the country and it still more or less holds true.