New Disney+ She-Hulk: Attorney at Law Featurette

New Disney+ She-Hulk: Attorney at Law Featurette


Jay Cochran - July 27, 2022
Tatiana Maslany is She-Hulk: Attorney at Law. Check out the new Original series, streaming August 17 on Disney+.

Image
1 of 1






Comments...

Last 10 comments - ( Read All Posts )
leokearon - 2022-08-10 @ 7:11 am
On 8/10/2022 at 8:06 AM, Atlantis said:

That's a gaudy outfit to be sure but it doesn't look like any version of Jack of Hearts I've seen. Not only are the colors incorrect, I don't see any hearts on the suit at all....and is that a sword hilt on his left hip? The color scheme makes me think....El Aguila?

I don't see the sword hilt. Still there is nothing to say they have tweaked the costume, of course it is hard to see who it is. We'll probably have to wait for the show or maybe another trailer to get a better look

Atlantis - 2022-08-10 @ 7:06 am
On 8/8/2022 at 10:59 PM, leokearon said:

More characters appearing including Porcupine, Man-Bull and what seems to be Jack Of Hearts

porcupine_by_leokearon_dfax97h-pre.jpg?t

That's a gaudy outfit to be sure but it doesn't look like any version of Jack of Hearts I've seen. Not only are the colors incorrect, I don't see any hearts on the suit at all....and is that a sword hilt on his left hip? The color scheme makes me think....El Aguila?

Satam - 2022-08-10 @ 1:45 am
On 8/9/2022 at 8:30 PM, glhshelby said:

Its all good, that was definitely me. To be fair I tried exactly that but something went wonky on my iPhone browser and it kept deleting the first quote/response. So I gave up and just posted twice. Sorry, Ill keep things tidier from now on.

The phone site never seems to work right for anyone.

glhshelby - 2022-08-10 @ 12:30 am
On 8/8/2022 at 6:31 PM, Satam said:

I'm not calling out anyone by name here, because this applies to everyone. That + button next to the Quote button is the multiquote function. Anyone responding to multiple posts within the span of a few minutes should use it instead of stacking posts.

Its all good, that was definitely me. To be fair I tried exactly that but something went wonky on my iPhone browser and it kept deleting the first quote/response. So I gave up and just posted twice. Sorry, Ill keep things tidier from now on.

leokearon - 2022-08-09 @ 6:59 am

More characters appearing including Porcupine, Man-Bull and what seems to be Jack Of Hearts

porcupine_by_leokearon_dfax97h-pre.jpg?t

Satam - 2022-08-08 @ 10:31 pm

I'm not calling out anyone by name here, because this applies to everyone. That + button next to the Quote button is the multiquote function. Anyone responding to multiple posts within the span of a few minutes should use it instead of stacking posts.

glhshelby - 2022-08-08 @ 8:15 pm
On 8/7/2022 at 6:54 PM, Jeddostotle7 said:

I think it's supposed to be "basically the same", or a soft reboot, where the Netflix shows basically happened, but in a fuzzy way where they can change details as necessary while the broad strokes stay the same

This is 100% what theyre going to do, and Im honestly surprised how many people dont seem to accept that. If they knew that this definitely wasnt going to be the same Murdock, then theyd just say so now and avoid making people angry.

Theyre going to write around any potential inconsistencys, so that huge fans of the original show (like me) can assume its the same character, while likely never continuing a single specific plot thread from the old series. And honestly Im fine with that. I much prefer it to a hard reboot of the character.

On 8/7/2022 at 8:30 PM, tarot said:

Well, if we look at the Incredible Hulk, that movie STILL happened but no one mentions it. It could be the same as DD and the rest of the Netflix stuff but no one will mention it.

Its funny when people say that, because the MCU references Incredible Hulk ALL THE TIME. The She Hulk trailer literally mentions it specifically. Mark Ruffalo mentions it specifically in the first Avengers. They showed footage of it in IM2 and Avengers. Ross became an ongoing MCU character.

Anyone who thinks the MCU somehow forgot that film is trying really hard to ignore all the evidence that they obviously didnt.

leokearon - 2022-08-08 @ 7:09 am
On 8/7/2022 at 11:06 PM, Lord_Scareglow said:

I really want to know , is this Matt Murdock supposed to be the same as the one from the Netflix shows? or is this just Charlie Cox playing a new Daredevil? honestly I feel I'm going to be mad if it's a whole new Daredevil and they just wipe away everything that happened in those Netflix shows..because that was good stuff, no need to reboot him, just plug him in.

but really why the Yellow+Red First Apperance suit, it's just super fan service.

I think it is supposed to be the same one, because "It's all connected". Of course they could go the Young Justice/Catwoman: Hunted route and have the Netflix series being "adjacent" to the MCU

Lord_Scareglow - 2022-08-08 @ 5:16 am
On 8/8/2022 at 1:04 AM, McHogan said:

Agree again. Disney as a brand may be shy to promote anything rated R but they also arent stupid and see what kind of $$ can be made by recent adult oriented super hero films.

Would a sanitized Disney version Deadpool still make money? Sure would. But would it be truly Deadpool?

Im sure D knows they can make R rated films and keep their status as a family friendly brand.

Of course they do, and with the fact that they have and promote Rated R or mature items on D+ , they know it sells, and I feel certain they have stated multiple times DP3 will retain the R rating, and if it's par for the course DP3 is going to be a huge hit unless they make some huge mistake and it's just not a good movie, it should open the doors for more rated R films in the MCU.

they need to just drop some F bombs at least, nobody can tell me if you are dealing with Thanos (man Infinity war and Endgame should have just been people sighing face palming and swearing) or a huge battalion of Sentinels you wouldn't want to scream some obscenity's it's just realistic.

McHogan - 2022-08-08 @ 5:04 am
On 8/8/2022 at 12:55 AM, Lord_Scareglow said:

Exactly, and Deadpool is case in point, both DP movies are rated R, and both of those movies did extremely well, we as grown ups surely as a whole didn't shy away from watching them, and kids wanted to watch em and likely ended up at some point, so it's not like making a Disney/Marvel Studio rated R film is going to make them flop at the box office (uh Joker was the the highest grossing rated R film ever, who wanted to see that? uh everyone), I bet it wouldn't do a single thing to change it, in fact bet that the first R rated Marvel Studios movie (likely DP3) will do insane numbers and some of it might just be because it's so well...rated R.

Agree again. Disney as a brand may be shy to promote anything rated R but they also arent stupid and see what kind of $$ can be made by recent adult oriented super hero films.

Would a sanitized Disney version Deadpool still make money? Sure would. But would it be truly Deadpool?

Im sure D knows they can make R rated films and keep their status as a family friendly brand.

Post Your Comment Now! (membership required)


MARVEL SHOPPING ONLINE


advertise here

Search Online Stores for Hasbro Marvel Legends

Search Ebay for Hasbro Marvel Legends Now


More Television News

Advertise on Marvelous News




This site uses cookies for site configuration, advertising, and analysis. By using this site you accept our policies - Read Full Site Policy OK
Sign Up For The TNI Newsletter And Have The News Delivered To You!


Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE