Marvel Legends Wave 3 Marvel Girl

Marvel Legends Wave 3 Marvel Girl


Tom - December 16, 2007

Package Description
No one ever said it was easy being a Summers. Rachel was born into a world on the brink of destruction, orphaned as an infant, and raised in a prison camp for people like herself. Despite it all, she spent a lifetime developing her psychic powers in secret, becoming so adept she was able to project her consciousness, and that of others, through time. Unable to use her powers to save her own world, she became determined to use them to the benefit of others. She has traveled from one end of time to the other, met death and dissolution along the way, and returned always fighting for freedom.

Appearance
Rachel is based on the art of Chris Bachalo. Except for the face, Iíd say the transition was done very well in proportions and size. My personal preference is for women to be drawn with a little more muscle, but Rachel is very close to the art. Her arms and legs still look a little cylindrical, but the shape of the limbs has improved since the days of ML Elektra. What really impressed me was the sculpting of the collar bones. Looking at figures like the new Invisible Woman, Hasbro could have skimped out of those details, so it was a nice surprise to see a more effort going into the figure. This is true of the abdomen as well, another area female figures often arenít sculpted well.

Iím not a big fan of the facial expression, but otherwise Iím happy with the head sculpt and paint application. Her jaw is very pointed, which is how she was drawn, but it still looks a little odd to me. Itís her lips that Iím disappointed in though, because the figure could show a lot more personality than the bland expression they gave her.

The only paint problems I really see on the figure are on the skirt, where some of the lines are blurred. Otherwise, she looks like a very clean cut figure where the plastic look isnít dominating the overall appearance. I do have a gripe with the hands; they donít look very much like gloves. The hands are hidden by the flames though, so itís not a big deal. I was very happy with the visibility of the joints on her skin except for the knees, which look outright hideous when bent. Overall, Rachel is a very nice looking figure, particularly on the scale of ML females.

Articulation
Rachel has ball jointed knees, ankles, elbows, and torso. For some reason she has pin jointed wrists good only for rotation. I have gotten little to no movement out of the ab joint except for rotation, so itís possible Iím wrong about what it was meant to do. The knees and elbows only bend about 90 degrees, and the head can look up virtually none. As would be expected, the skirt limits movement of the legs, even as short as it is. Overall, Rachel has a lot of failings in this category even for a Hasbro figure. The range of motion could have been a lot better.

Poseability
Rachel does stick out a little from Toybiz figures, but not as much I was expecting because of the more natural skin tones compared to earlier HML skin tones. She should do reasonably well on display in an established or new collection. The articulation is the big limiting factor here. In particular, the small feet and ball jointed ankles cause balance issues. The facial expression also limits the poses Iím willing to display her in, because she just doesnít look like sheís in a fighting mood. The included flames look good and are of a good design. Iíve only had problems with the one for her right hand falling off sometimes. She can pull off a good number of poses because of the quality of the sculpt, but the limiting factors are still there. Overall, Iím happy with what she can do, but there may be some fans who expected a little bit more out of their Marvel Girl.

Final Judgment: 7
I think this figure works well despite its limitations, which is the sign of a good figure. I still feel there could have been some improvements made, and I personally would have liked to have seen the face done in a different style. But every time I find a good pose for the figure I like it a little more. Iíve got the feeling that even though Iím not a fan of the character or the particular style, the figure pleases a lot of people. So Iím going to give Rachel a ď7Ē, because itís a solid sculpt and a good improvement for female figures.

SCALE

10. My favorite possession.

9. My favorite action figure.

8. One of my favorite action figures.

7. An exceptional action figure.

6. A good, but not exceptional action figure.

5. An adequate action figure.

4. Not worth the money I spent.

3. I'll give it to somebody's kid.

2. I'll give it to somebody's dog.

1. It's going to lose a fight with my car.

Click Here to see Marvel Girl in the Database

WE NEED YOU! Marvelous News needs reviews for all figures in the Database (that do not yet have a review), please Click Here if you would like to submit your own Marvel toy review(s) to be shown on MarvelousNews.com!
Image 1 of 33
1 of 33
Image 2 of 33
2 of 33
Image 3 of 33
3 of 33
Image 4 of 33
4 of 33
Image 5 of 33
5 of 33
Image 6 of 33
6 of 33
Image 7 of 33
7 of 33
Image 8 of 33
8 of 33
Image 9 of 33
9 of 33
Image 10 of 33
10 of 33
Image 11 of 33
11 of 33
Image 12 of 33
12 of 33
Image 13 of 33
13 of 33
Image 14 of 33
14 of 33
Image 15 of 33
15 of 33
Image 16 of 33
16 of 33
Image 17 of 33
17 of 33
Image 18 of 33
18 of 33
Image 19 of 33
19 of 33
Image 20 of 33
20 of 33
Image 21 of 33
21 of 33
Image 22 of 33
22 of 33
Image 23 of 33
23 of 33
Image 24 of 33
24 of 33
Image 25 of 33
25 of 33
Image 26 of 33
26 of 33
Image 27 of 33
27 of 33
Image 28 of 33
28 of 33
Image 29 of 33
29 of 33
Image 30 of 33
30 of 33
Image 31 of 33
31 of 33
Image 32 of 33
32 of 33
Image 33 of 33
33 of 33

Comments...

Last 10 comments - ( Read All Posts )
gambit329 - 2007-12-20 @ 10:28 pm
You certainly have a right to your opinion. I don't share it in this case, although I agree with most of your reviews.

For me, paint and articulation matter a lot. They're what got me back into figure collecting - especially the articulation. So, a figure like this is pretty useless to me. 1/10.

Even flawed figures like Wasp or Electra were miles better than this one, in my book. This one is worse than all but the very worst of the Toybiz female figures. I even like Scarlett Witch better than this thing!

are you guys KIDDING me?!?!

Rachel Grey is by far the best female Hasbro has put out and one of the best females overall in the ML line. My only problem is the paint applications...but it's a problem i have with every hasbro figure. i would have given her an 8.

She looks like a great medium between realistic figure and the art she is taken from.

and Scarlett Witch is the 2nd worst ML ever (with Emma being first)....Scarlet Witch has a terrible body and a diaper and a big bobble head and a boring paint application - so how could you say Rachel looks any worse than that?

but i guess it all depends on what you like in figures and opinions and such.

i don't like diapers on my figures - but hey maybe you do.

and that's ok.

TomE - 2007-12-20 @ 9:15 pm
wait a second... anybody is allowed to submit a review now??

I thought that was RYNO's job.

anyhow... that review was way off for me... she is one of the worst ML figures ever

CLAM, c'mon where've you been? Tom has been reviewing for MarvelousNews and TNI for months he's not just anybody he is THE reviewer. here: (link) and here: (link) and for the record, ya anybody can submit reader reviews...

oops.. I had never seen him review Marvel Legends... I knew you did wave 1, 2, the FF, and Spidey wave reviews...

actually, FF and Spidey wave reviews are either mine or reader reviews. Look up in the top left corner, if its posted by "Tom" and isn't labeled as a reader review, its by me.

Dentarthurdent - 2007-12-20 @ 8:39 pm
in my book shes a 8, with the variant being a 9 bc of better paint job. she may have low articulation but imo shes the best female ml yet w/psylock in 2nd and warbird in 3rd

She ok's but an 8 she's not....at least not for me. For me Dark Phoenix still tops her, easily. :)

Ick. I gotta go with Jessica Alba (movie 1) Invisible Woman (the one with the joints), Psylocke, and then Electra. And I like Bachalo's art, but it didn't work translated to 3-d here.

HighEvolutionary - 2007-12-20 @ 8:10 pm
i think she's actually pretty good. the elbows are fine by me, since they get almost more than 90 degrees. plus, im a sucker for red heads...

I agree. I like that it has those little flame accessories, has a nicely painted face, and has some neat little details like the hoop earrings and the separate necklace piece. Still despise the knee and elbow joints, but overall, it's one of the best figures in the wave (and I don't even know who Marvel Girl is).

CLAM34 - 2007-12-20 @ 6:03 pm
wait a second... anybody is allowed to submit a review now??

I thought that was RYNO's job.

anyhow... that review was way off for me... she is one of the worst ML figures ever

CLAM, c'mon where've you been? Tom has been reviewing for MarvelousNews and TNI for months he's not just anybody he is THE reviewer. here: (link) and here: (link) and for the record, ya anybody can submit reader reviews...

oops.. I had never seen him review Marvel Legends... I knew you did wave 1, 2, the FF, and Spidey wave reviews...

Ryno - 2007-12-20 @ 5:17 pm
wait a second... anybody is allowed to submit a review now??

I thought that was RYNO's job.

anyhow... that review was way off for me... she is one of the worst ML figures ever

CLAM, c'mon where've you been? Tom has been reviewing for MarvelousNews and TNI for months he's not just anybody he is THE reviewer. here: (link) and here: (link) and for the record, ya anybody can submit reader reviews...

Marvel Girl, Rachel Grey was one of my favorite figures from this wave. They captured Chris Bachalo's art perfectly and while she has limited articulation (par for the course since Hasbro took over anyway) there's still plenty of flame holding and pointing gestures you can get out of here that look great on display.

TomE - 2007-12-20 @ 4:48 pm
You certainly have a right to your opinion. I don't share it in this case, although I agree with most of your reviews.

For me, paint and articulation matter a lot. They're what got me back into figure collecting - especially the articulation. So, a figure like this is pretty useless to me. 1/10.

Even flawed figures like Wasp or Electra were miles better than this one, in my book. This one is worse than all but the very worst of the Toybiz female figures. I even like Scarlett Witch better than this thing!

Can't win 'em all right?

Since several of you seem to disagree, guess you guys can blame finals. I was pretty happy to be done with this semester.

CLAM34 - 2007-12-20 @ 10:48 am

wait a second... anybody is allowed to submit a review now??

I thought that was RYNO's job.

anyhow... that review was way off for me... she is one of the worst ML figures ever

h3llfish - 2007-12-20 @ 6:02 am

You certainly have a right to your opinion. I don't share it in this case, although I agree with most of your reviews.

For me, paint and articulation matter a lot. They're what got me back into figure collecting - especially the articulation. So, a figure like this is pretty useless to me. 1/10.

Even flawed figures like Wasp or Electra were miles better than this one, in my book. This one is worse than all but the very worst of the Toybiz female figures. I even like Scarlett Witch better than this thing!

TomTom - 2007-12-18 @ 2:53 am

i think she's actually pretty good. the elbows are fine by me, since they get almost more than 90 degrees. plus, im a sucker for red heads...

Post Your Comment Now! (membership required)


MARVEL SHOPPING ONLINE


advertise here

More Marvel Reviews

More Marvel Reviews
advertise here














Entertainment News International (ENI) is the #1 popular culture network for adult fans all around the world.
Get the scoop on all the popular comics, games, movies, toys, and more every day!

Contact and Support

Advertising | Submit News | Contact ENI | Privacy Policy

©Entertainment News International - All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident. Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE