Time to chime in with my two pennies...I love the BAF concept!! I feel like I'm getting a bonus with my purchase! I also love that if I don't want the BAF I don't need to purchase every figure in a wave( yes Titus I'm looking at you)
That being said...I love the Deluxe figure concepts as well. Archangel was an Awesome Deluxe figure and I hope for more in the future.
Now do I feel like Hasbro is double dipping? YEP...sure do. KINGPIN for example. I would have waited for the Spidey classic version, Had I known it was coming....I still wanted figures from the BAF wave but not ALL of them.
So..if you are reading this for a solid answer...I don't have one.
I want more Deluxe figures in the future like Angel, Griffin and Dragon Man AND I want BAF's like Charlie 27 and Warstar.
Maybe use the BAF concept could be for more obscure characters and the Deluxe concept for more well known characters?
I just don't see moms wanting to buy their precious bundles of joy a Deluxe Sugar Man on the Toy aisles.
The figure is ok, just never cared for the character in the comics.
14 minutes ago, Gigantor said:I seriously beg to differ on Paladin being a better figure than Iron man foes Spymaster & Blizzard. Only thing Paladin has been good for is to slap on Skrull heads & make generic Skrull grunts out of him cuz he already sports the basic Skrull colors of Black/purple. Already made 4 of em using that recipe.
I liked Paladin, would have preferred his earlier costume. But i think that we got aneasily modified, character on a buck with new forearms and new lower legs made it a far better figure as far as sculpt goes than blizzard and spymaster which are almost straight repaints. Blizzard being a straight repaint.
On 5/7/2020 at 7:47 AM, EUPHORICVIKING said:I think Paladdin has had enough showings in the comics to warrant a figure. I mean the figure itself is better than Spymaster or Blizzard.I
I seriously beg to differ on Paladin being a better figure than Iron man foes Spymaster & Blizzard. Only thing Paladin has been good for is to slap on Skrull heads & make generic Skrull grunts out of him cuz he already sports the basic Skrull colors of Black/purple. Already made 4 of em using that recipe.
On 5/6/2020 at 9:32 PM, MonsterChris said:...
...
...so...why are you here?
He's here to prove his alphaness....
Black series does not have BAF and same price point with new scuplts for most figure. Wave have many repaints and use of old sculpts. I would like to see BAF's go away. Give characters more heads, hands, or other accessories instead. If they fear not selling certain characters they shouldbundle them in packs with a popular character.
One word, two letters: NO
I'd say, no to stopping with BAFs in favor of deluxe figures taking their place. The deluxe concept is really nice for figures to get out there with some additional accessories or vehicles, but the BAFs need to be left alone. The more recent instances like Kingpin, Walmart Thanos, Groot Evolution, and even Venommake sense, because of specific circumstances.
-Kingpin, we all wanted two BAFs one for Kingpin and one for Shadow King. This fixes that problem without having to a whole second BAF from a lackluster wave, plus this is a classic first appearance Kingpin, which just vibes a bit better with most Spidey and Daredevil set ups.
-Thanos, the original BAF wasn't that great, the colors weren't very eye catching even for a modern comic look, plus a new head and an infinity gauntlet made the figure into more of a new/upgraded figure anyways.
-Groot Evolution, again better paint apps, and if you wanted all the figures because "Groot Mania" fine. Easy pass otherwise. The re-re-release makes some sense since TRU exclusives weren't always the easiest to find near the end.
-Venom, I mean it's less accurate to have a Brock version of Venom be quite this massive, but it was a hard to find figure and it's definitely a different host so it works. Though I still prefer the original Tony Moore inspired BAF this one works fine and it's easy enough to pass if you bought the other one.
Overall we know they won't drop the price if they drop the BAF, so for that major reason alone I'm not okay with it. You don't get a large amount of extra accessories per figure in lines like Lightning Collection, which have the same price point as Legends, are made by Hasbro, and don't have a BAF. On average we get almost as many hands, heads, and effects with a good chunk of the characters, plus sometimes a BAF piece. Leave the BAF be, but also space the re-releases out more so that people can feel better about the value of their original figure or whatever, and others can have a change down the road without paying insane prices online.
50 minutes ago, tarot said:No chance. They have moved on from the endgame figures.
I could definitely see hasbro not revisiting prof hulk, but i stillthink some sort of final battle trio set with Cap, Iron Man, Thor will come at some point, probably sooner rather than later. I think armored Thanos BAF gets a re-release at some point too, but of course i could be way off. I could also instead see them doing a set with just Iron Man and Thanos, or a set with Cap/Thor/Thanos as an alternative to the trio of heroes set.
22 minutes ago, tarot said:No chance. They have moved on from the endgame figures.
They could always revisit. We got Red Skull a couple years ago and he's from 2011. Peggy Carter came last year. Ultron and Ronan 2 years ago. I mean, I'm still holding my fingers crossed for a Quicksilver, unlikely as he may be. There's always a chance IMO.
Shop Online Stores for Hasbro Marvel Legends
Shopping links on this site may generate revenue when a purchase is made.
SOCIAL NETWORKS
ToyNewsI
MarvelousNews
Tformers
JediInsider
Entertainment News International (ENI) is the oldest, largest, and most popular news source for adult toy collectors (kidults) all around the world.
Get the scoop every day on all the popular culture action figures, comics, games, movies, toys, and more!
Contact and Support
Advertising |
Submit News |
Contact ENI |
Privacy Policy
All images, trademarks, logos, video, brands and images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies and owners. All Rights Reserved. Data has been shared for news reporting purposes only. All content sourced by fans, online websites, and or other fan community sources. Entertainment News International is not responsible for reporting errors, inaccuracies, omissions, and or other liablities related to news shared here. We do our best to keep tabs on infringements. If some of your content was shared by accident.
Please Contact us about any infringements right away - CLICK HERE